What I was lookg for turns out to be in full agreement with Deborah Williams above. the least populationn deviation an dthe most together boundaries.
thus keep it straight forward and simple, right? Thanks for all the hard work putting this together.
Deborah, this plan spilts my neighborhood. I think this is not a good idea. Berkeley Road goes right through the middle and it just feels weird that my neighbors would have a different council member. We go to the same parks, have the same issues. We need to be in the same district.
Please don’t split a district along Berkeley Road!
I would suggest not letting the population deviation value overshadow the discussion. In order to get that low value, a small “island” was created in district 4. I would be in favor of slightly higher population deviation to avoid strange boundaries and possibly disenfranchised segments. Plan 226 looks good, but suffers from the same issue.
This is my favorite map/plan. It has the second least population deviation of any of the plans, and the best, most compact boundaries.
What I was lookg for turns out to be in full agreement with Deborah Williams above. the least populationn deviation an dthe most together boundaries.
thus keep it straight forward and simple, right? Thanks for all the hard work putting this together.
Deborah, this plan spilts my neighborhood. I think this is not a good idea. Berkeley Road goes right through the middle and it just feels weird that my neighbors would have a different council member. We go to the same parks, have the same issues. We need to be in the same district.
Please don’t split a district along Berkeley Road!
Above comment from me. (Forgot to leave my name).
I would suggest not letting the population deviation value overshadow the discussion. In order to get that low value, a small “island” was created in district 4. I would be in favor of slightly higher population deviation to avoid strange boundaries and possibly disenfranchised segments. Plan 226 looks good, but suffers from the same issue.