I like plan 701 and I like this plan also, because they best use the natural division lines of Hwy 101 and Glen Annie Rd. However, this plan might have more appeal to those in area 1.
I’d like to add that I think it’s important for area 3 residents to be grouped with the Fairview and Calle Real shopping areas, and also with the Cathedral Oaks corridor along La Patera Ranch. That encompasses “Goleta North” which is already akin to a district or small town.
no we should not make a district straddle US 101 so much like #1 in this plan. Goleta west and south of 101 should definitely include Ellwood Mesa. why would Ellwood as we know it be divided?
I glanced mostly at the NDC-generated maps along with the demographics data. I think this redistricting map is the most logical of all three.
I like plan 701 and I like this plan also, because they best use the natural division lines of Hwy 101 and Glen Annie Rd. However, this plan might have more appeal to those in area 1.
I’d like to add that I think it’s important for area 3 residents to be grouped with the Fairview and Calle Real shopping areas, and also with the Cathedral Oaks corridor along La Patera Ranch. That encompasses “Goleta North” which is already akin to a district or small town.
no we should not make a district straddle US 101 so much like #1 in this plan. Goleta west and south of 101 should definitely include Ellwood Mesa. why would Ellwood as we know it be divided?