Plan 226 City Staff welcomes your feedback on the following map. Please leave a comment below. Click here to view the Demographics for this map (PDF) cityofgoleta2022-01-24T10:54:22-08:00 6 Comments Steve Nelson January 24, 2022 at 8:38 pmLog in to Reply After doing my best to review these proposals I like this one the best. It respects neighborhoods and geographical and other physical boundaries (major roads, freeways, etc) pretty well with a pretty good population deviation number. I think this is the least forced, most natural, and best balanced of the plans. Anonymous January 25, 2022 at 10:12 pmLog in to Reply On the whole, I would agree with this comment (above), but then if you look very carefully at District 4, there’s a strange little island in the lower left part of District 4 which must be how the population deviation was reduced. Doesn’t look good. For the same reasons as stated above (respecting neighborhoods and natural boundaries), I’d go with 403 or 209 or 210F instead. Anonymous January 26, 2022 at 10:25 amLog in to Reply this could be a good plan if the district 1 and 3 Glen Anne Rd divider was moved to N Lake Los Carneros Rd. This way Bishop Ranch is in district 1 and Lake Los Careros in district 3. Steve Nelson January 28, 2022 at 10:03 amLog in to Reply This process is way too complicated for most civilians. There needs to be a better, more streamlined way of presenting this information to the public to elicit participation! Anonymous February 1, 2022 at 5:58 pmLog in to Reply This plan breaks up my neighborhood (Storke Ranch) in a weird way, so it doesn’t make sense to me. Kelly Hildner February 1, 2022 at 6:01 pmLog in to Reply This plan breaks up my neighborhood (Storke Ranch) in a weird way, so it doesn’t make sense to me. Leave A Comment Cancel replyYou must be logged in to post a comment.