Of the plans that meet the minimum My #1 preference is #202 first, and #702 second. So many of the other plans divide cohesive residential communities .
While there are some small differences in these 2 plans, they both have a good distribution of various people and are in geographic areas that are mostly the same.
They have schools that serve most of the residents of that district.
I think this is a good plan for reasons mentioned above. It keeps neighborhoods cohesive. We need this to be able to have a sense of community and to work with our council member on any issues and improvements.
I don’t like that this one separates my neighborhood from our adjacent neighborhoods to the west and instead groups Storke Ranch with a bunch of commercial areas and Old Town.
Of the plans that meet the minimum My #1 preference is #202 first, and #702 second. So many of the other plans divide cohesive residential communities .
While there are some small differences in these 2 plans, they both have a good distribution of various people and are in geographic areas that are mostly the same.
They have schools that serve most of the residents of that district.
I think this is a good plan for reasons mentioned above. It keeps neighborhoods cohesive. We need this to be able to have a sense of community and to work with our council member on any issues and improvements.
This one makes the most sense, -and though there are no perfect solutions the borders are at least mostly contiguous.
I don’t like that this one separates my neighborhood from our adjacent neighborhoods to the west and instead groups Storke Ranch with a bunch of commercial areas and Old Town.